The initial interview for designers can begin with the following three questions, each corresponding to a specific work scenario. First, ask about the approach, then follow up with the basis for the judgment, giving the candidate a chance to clearly explain their work methods.
Three core questions and directions for further inquiry
Question 1: The client says they want to make some more changes, how do you define the scope?
Follow-up question: Please specify what information will be confirmed in the first step, what will be done next, and why this arrangement is made.
Question 2: How do you get the other person to choose between two directions?
Follow-up question: If there is insufficient information or the original approach is not feasible, who would you consult and how would you adjust it?
Question 3: If you only have one day left on your release date, what would you prioritize?
Follow-up question: When a task comes to an end, how do you confirm the result and let the person taking over know what needs to be done?
What should be observed in this position?
Revisions, deadlines, and alignment requirements define the work environment. Observe whether the candidate can: connect design choices with requirements, define the scope of revisions, and explain file specifications and delivery arrangements. Simply saying they are meticulous and cooperative is not enough to confirm these abilities.
How can I write my answer record?
You can use three types of notes: "Sufficient Evidence," "Questions Need Further Answer," and "Work-Related Concerns Arise." Include a sentence of supporting evidence for each judgment. If you haven't done the same job, you can answer using a simulated scenario; don't simply give zero points for lack of experience in the same position.
This is a company-defined evaluation method, not a verified competency test, and it does not mean that the system will automatically score according to this method.
Simulated work samples after the initial test
Describe a revision process using publicly available work, then list the deliverables to be confirmed based on a brief, simulated requirement. Please use publicly available, anonymous, or fictitious materials, and first state the purpose, timeframe, and review method.
Interview answers can only provide partial evidence. When there are professional technical or on-site operational requirements, further confirmation should be arranged by appropriate personnel, and then evaluated together with working hours, compensation, and onboarding arrangements.
Could the next step be to consider hiring based on gut feeling after the interview? Or could we use work experience as evidence to organize the selection criteria ?
Explore the interview system plan for SMEs
The MIND Interview plan for SMEs costs NT$3,000 for six months and includes 50 resume analyses and 15 AI interviews in total over six months. It helps you screen resumes, conduct first-round interviews online and organize reports. Your company reviews the results and makes the hiring decision.
Once you have prepared the job openings, the expected number of resumes, and the number of interviewees, you can confirm with the team whether the plan is suitable and how to start using it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Key questions often raised by business leaders and HR teams:
How should a designer answer if they lack relevant work experience?
You can answer using relevant projects, learning experiences, or simulated processing methods. Review the methods and basis, and arrange for work samples to confirm if necessary.
After the initial designer interview, how can I supplement my work ability with evidence?
Present a revised design using publicly available work samples, followed by a brief, simulated list of deliverables requiring confirmation. The key is to connect design choices with requirements, define the scope of revisions, and outline file specifications and delivery arrangements. The company will arrange and review the initial presentation; the preliminary summary will not be considered the final acceptance decision.