When recruiting engineers, assign a person to be responsible for each of the following tasks: receiving documents, reviewing them, conducting initial interviews, and conducting final interviews. If the company is small, the same person can handle all of these tasks, but each step should still have clear completion conditions.
Let's start with the deliverables of this job.
This role involves reviewing portfolios, discussing progress, and dealing with constantly changing requirements. Before opening the position, we should discuss projects that demonstrate individual contributions, troubleshooting methods, collaboration and delivery, and confirm which aspects require pre-employment training and which can be arranged. Different tasks or shifts need to be explained separately.
Weekly Schedule Example
- At the beginning of the week, the hiring manager confirms the tasks, time, location, and compensation scope, and the administration organizes the received resumes.
- During the week, review resume analysis and source materials to clarify any information gaps in the modules, testing and debugging, and code collaboration that you are actually responsible for.
- After review, a preliminary test invitation will be issued, specifying the number of questions, the deadline, and the contact information for handling difficulties.
- Once the candidates are selected, the supervisor will review the report and decide whether to conduct an interview or conduct a supplementary selection; the next steps will be communicated simultaneously.
This is a scheduling example, which can be adjusted according to the candidate's schedule. Each invitation should have a response window; there's no need to wait until the weekend to handle ad-hoc issues.
How do supervisors and administrators hand over responsibilities?
Administrative staff are responsible for tracking the status of received documents and notifications; supervisors assess the evidence and necessary conditions for work. When professional competence requires practical experience or completed projects to be confirmed, qualified personnel are assigned to assist.
For engineers, this mock exercise can be used in subsequent interviews: Using a small program or public project that does not contain company secrets as an example, explain how to reproduce, fix, and test a problem. When reviewing, pay attention to pointing out your individual responsibility, outlining reproducible steps, and explaining the testing and trade-offs, rather than simply listing technical terms.
What adjustments are needed after the first round?
If multiple people have different understandings of a project that demonstrates an individual's contribution, first revise the full-time vacancy explanation; if the review is stalled due to a lack of response from the supervisor, reserve a fixed review period. Using tools can help organize information, but the company still needs to complete communication and personnel decisions.
The next step can be to refer to the three-step process from resume to interview for small and medium-sized enterprises without human resources .
Explore the interview system plan for SMEs
The MIND Interview plan for SMEs costs NT$3,000 for six months and includes 50 resume analyses and 15 AI interviews in total over six months. It helps you screen resumes, conduct first-round interviews online and organize reports. Your company reviews the results and makes the hiring decision.
Once you have prepared the job openings, the expected number of resumes, and the number of interviewees, you can confirm with the team whether the plan is suitable and how to start using it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Key questions often raised by business leaders and HR teams:
Without a dedicated HR person, who is responsible for reviewing the initial screening of engineers?
This can be handled by the boss or the person in charge, with administrative assistance for data compilation and notification. Professional tasks should be assigned to individuals capable of assessing this skill level.
After the initial engineer interview, how can I supplement my work ability with evidence?
Using a small program or public project that does not contain company secrets as an example, please explain how to reproduce, fix, and test a problem. The focus should be on identifying your responsible part, outlining reproducible steps, and explaining the testing and trade-offs, rather than simply listing technical terms. The initial screening summary will be arranged and reviewed by the company and will not be considered the final hiring decision.